Reviews of Movies You Should See: Ghosts

by Kate
Silhoutte of Marichen Ibsen (1799-1869) as a y...

Silhoutte of Marichen Ibsen (1799-1869) as a young girl, mother of Henrik Ibsen (Marichen Altenburg) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

When discussing the heated topic of adultery, if anyone ever needs an example of how one man’s immorality can affect everyone he comes in contact with, the Henrik Ibsen play, Ghosts, is it.  In our haste to condemn all divorce, especially at the behest of our innocent and inexperienced clergy, we often foster much more damage than expected.

 This 1986 movie captures the usual dark and foreboding undertones of Ibsen’s work, such as A Doll’s House, and Hedda Gabler, and represents a stellar portrayal of anguish in a showcase of English acting royalty: Judi Dench plays the distraught mother, Kenneth Branagh the agonized son, Natasha Richardson the illegitimate daughter, and Michael Gambon (most popularly known as the second Dumbledore) plays the easily duped parson.

 When we talk about women’s roles in the family, there is no other author than Ibsen who has looked so realistically at women’s problems.  He examines what makes a good mother, what makes a good wife, and never fails to shock his audience with some question of morality, whether it be seeing a mother walk out on her children; a woman kill herself to avoid bearing the child of a man she doesn’t deem worthy; or, in this case, come to terms with the impending death of her son, who has requested she help end his life due to the STD his father transferred to him.

 Ibsen burrowed his way into the marrow of people’s souls and motivations and undoubtedly understood the feminine imperative, but focused on the feminine dilemma.  This nineteenth century Norwegian playwright is often called “the father” of modern theater and wrote what are referred to as “problem” plays.  They are designed to get you thinking, and think you will.

This play, more so than what I remember in the other two I studied, showed the female lead acknowledging her part in the disaster that was her marriage.  Much as Elizabeth Proctor in The Crucible eventually comes to the understanding that  her lack of joy and keeping a cold house caused her husband to stray, there came a moment in this play when Mrs. Alving realized her complicity in the events that unfold.

She calls herself a coward for protecting her husband and not allowing his deeds to ruin his reputation and blames herself for being a poor mother for sending her son away at the age of seven so that he would not be infected by his father’s influence.  Yet, she also reproaches the parson (who thinks he did her a great service in sending her back to her husband) with the knowledge that when he rejected her love and refused her amnesty, he did her no favor; although to outward appearances her life improved, behind closed doors, it remained the same.

Oh, how easy it is to judge others without knowing their full stories.  And, as the parson finds out, how easy too it is to slip and find oneself as low and dejected as those one never believed one could have anything in common with.  Watch the movie and see the grim results for yourself.  As Oscar Wilde, another great playwright, stated, “Every saint has a past and every sinner has a future.”

9 Responses to “Reviews of Movies You Should See: Ghosts”

  1. Here is the actual movie, I believe. I’ll watch it myself and report back:

  2. I’m not that much into ghost or supernatural movies, but I will have to check out the movies you just mentioned. Great article.

  3. I watched it. It is definitely not for modern tastes; there are no gunfights or explosions, in fact it all occurs inside two rooms. Did the parson set the orphange on fire? I thought Regina was quite fetching as a servant girl. I also liked the mode of dress of the women, it was very becoming. Women would do well to cause a man’s imagination to stray rather than his eyes.

    • Its all about content. Heavy.

      “Did the parson set the orphanage on fire?” Not likely. Regina’s “father”/swindler gets him to believe he did, but the “father” most likely did it himself. After all the revelations he has heard that day, Mrs. Alving’s real ones and the “father’s” fake ones, he is so unsure of everything he can even believe that he was the culprit. The fake father then gets the money to invest in his “home for sailors” which is likely a facade for a brothel. This was my first encounter with this story, and I’d have to read the play to get all the details, but it was quite a good one. Glad you watched it!

  4. Glad you liked my Essay on ‘Ghost’ and gave me this link toyour site. Really liked your approach to the play.

Trackbacks

Leave Comment: Comments do not require an email -- or even logging in

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: