Manosphere on Fire

by Kate Minter

It may not seem like it, but Chris Humphries did have a life before, during, and after his courtship and seventy-two day marriage to media whorelet, Kim Kardashian.  Breaking her way into infamy with a leaked sex tape, Miss Kardashian, has had her ass in our face ever since. 

 Now, to be fair, I will say two nice things about her before I get on the stump asking why this story does not receive more media attention and why men should be getting behind Humphries as a symbol of male defiance.  Nice thing number one:  I have “kept up with the Kardashians” and, from time to time, Kim exhibits sweet tendancies.  Nice thing number two: in the final episode of “Kourtney and Kim Take New York,” she declined to actually break up with Chris on camera expressing her anguish that she was the one who had made a mistake and that she didn’t want to treat Chris that way.

 However, now that the divorce does not appear that it will be over as quickly as the marriage, one may have second thoughts about just why the break up was left off camera.  In a somewhat unusual circumstance, Humphries is seeking not only divorce from his former honeybuns, but also an annulment.  The reason cited?  Fraud.  Humphries seems to feel that Kardashian never intended to go through with the marriage, and that the whole thing was a publicity stunt.

 Much of the public wondered the same thing, but they, no doubt, tuned in to the show to see what happened, creating revenue for guess who.  Kayne West, who is now Kardashian’s boyfriend, appeared in one episode, and any red-pill man could put two and two together and see what happened.  From the fact that Humphries wants Kayne deposed, he may have cottoned on as well.

 So, why is it that this story is not making more headlines?  As a devotee of E! News, I was a bit surprised I didn’t know the details and only noticed an article about it on Yahoo news today when this has been going on since December.  Well, silly me.  The Kardashian family makes up almost half of E!’s programming.  Its no wonder they are keeping it hushed up.  But what about the manosphere?  Here’s a cause for it worth championing. 

 It has all the ingredients of a blue-pill man tale of woe (except the exorbitant bank accounts of the principals).  And, I, for one, have got to say I respect this dude for not going quietly into that good night.  He was made a fool of on a national scale and not even an annulment is good enough for him.  I’d like to see the episode where Kim gives Chris a public apology for her hypergamy. 

 Instead, she wants him to pay her legal fees and to have this thing over as quickly as possible.  Hold up!  Does she realize she married him?  Does adultery mean nothing anymore?  Is she so in haste to be on Kayne’s wick that she can’t see straight?  Well, I think we all know the answer to that.

 Men, spread the news.  The whore should lose. 

21 Responses to “Manosphere on Fire”

  1. NB: Sorry it took so long, boss. Hope you will be back with us soon! Snugglebunny kisses and whatnot :)

  2. Back from the dead! Nice site you’ve been hiding away.

    I wouldn’t hold my breath on that apology. Kristen Steward won’t be apologizing either, not really. Kim is a mixer like all the women in her family, which is why I dislike her.

    • I have to give Tertullian some of the credit. He told me to take a break at Rollo’s. lol

      Thank you on the site. I only attached it to my gravatar over the weekend. It was finished a couple weeks ago and I had only shared it with close friends. I hope to add to it soon, but I’ve got a thousand projects going simultaneously. I had about three half-written articles for here, but nothing was solidifying, then, this topic popped up and thirty minutes later, done.

      No, there will be no apology. She did that earlier through her mother in the morning talk show rounds when she actually felt more contrition. Now, that is not the case. Now that she is ensconced in a new relationship, she’ll have her battle gear on.

  3. ‘Miss Kardashian, has had her ass in our face ever since. ‘

    lol, ain’t that the truth!

    I know American men are breast lovers, but come on fellas, a one hand ‘ass’ is nice to slap around too. Plus they don’t pile the kilos on as they get older.

  4. Dang! I just realized I spelled his name wrong throughout the entire article. I would edit it to be correct, but I think it goes to show his name is less well-known. Figures it starts with a “K.”

  5. Splendid piece, GK. Well said.

    I would change “the whore should lose” to “the whore should die”.

    But I’m rather harsh when it comes to these cretins.

    Nothing less than a fucking blood-storm will wipe away the filth.

  6. Kim K’s fatal flaw is her complete lust for fame for which, she will sacrifice every remaining, worn-through millimeter of her vaginal lining.

    • Agreed. And yet she wanted to be the married with children sister. She might still be it as Kourtney has the kids but not the marriage, and Kloe has the marriage but not the kids. I did some more reading and found it interesting to note that at thirty-one, she was four years older then Kris. His actions showed he clearly lacked maturity and their goals were at complete odds. One wonders how and why they hooked up in the first place.

      Reflecting on the children issue, Kris had wanted her to live in his home state with him and start a family. She didn’t want to go there and while she was at first unsure about the children issue, her firends talked her out of it. Well, at least, that’s how it was presented on television. If anything, hopefully it will be educational to viewers to consider discussing these important questions BEFORE marriage versus afterwards.

  7. GeishaKate. Watching The Kardashians so we don’t have to. Delivering the manosphere Talk Soup for the Soul since 2012.

    • LOL! Its one small service I can provide with relative ease for those who have given me so much:) {You’d better be on your guard here, Matt. I have editing power on my articles. Oh, the heady rush of POWAH! So hard to resist.:)}

      ps: Watched Fashion Police last night with special guest Ryan Lochte. That show is my true guilty pleasure; I think Joan Rivers is the funniest woman alive.

      • Well, after you come down off your megalomaniacal high, use your newfound editorial powers to correct the spelling of “Fashion” in your own post.

        While you’re at it, fix my latter ass link. I forgot to put the words “less cartoonish” within the slash-A HTML code brackets.

        Chop chop.

      • item #1: Yeah, yeah, I already saw it. I just figure I don’t need to go crazy on the perfection thingy.

        item #2: Snort. Like I know how to do that. Firepower, can you help, please?

        Chop chop? How delightfully apt. I was on that like a Kardashian on a pro athlete, and now there is plenty more wood for the fireplace that is Eradica.

      • I did it! I did it! :) Please don’t ever send me to those sites again. *shudder*

      • “Please don’t ever send me to those sites again. *shudder*”

        No can promise. There are no sites that reliably celebrate female beauty without sexualizing it, alas. In fact, it is rare to meet a person who can even distinguish between the terms “beautiful” and “sexy,” one describing “what a woman is,” the other describing “what you want to do to her.”

        “Assthetic” = punny. Well done. You are in the top percentile of wordsmiths among the commentariat.

        GeishaKate’s ripostes : combox talk :: Kerya Agustina’s bottom : derrieres.

        Now, do you take my observation as a compliment, an insult, or — that wonderful combination of the two — a neg? It all depends on a girl’s perception. (What power a woman retains over even the subtlest of PUA tricks, if only she willed it!)

        Matt

      • “There are no sites that reliably celebrate female beauty without sexualizing it, alas.”

        Cockypop!

        Of course I take it as a compliment, but, have you seen my ass? ;)

      • I don’t have any. I was just stating the reason for those site’s existence. (Almost succumbed to editing your comment there. I cannot be trusted!)

Trackbacks

Leave Comment: Comments do not require an email -- or even logging in

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,443 other followers

%d bloggers like this: