Dalrock: Deceptive Hypocrite, Bore & Apostate

by Firepower

Fill Me…With Your Spirit

UPDATE: Five days later and not one “christian” has dared speak here.  Hundreds of energetic God’s Lil’ Helpers’ comments all arguing about Angels Dancing on The Head of a Pin stuff… there.

Is it any wonder xtians are such a miserable failure online? 

All the power of that tool at “God’s” disposal  and what comes of it?  Nothing but more church closures.  This is why the Daldorkian Type will be judged as a failure by ZodMissionaries to the Country Club.  Armchair Evangelists preaching safely to the choir. 

Dalrock is Caiaphas.  A chickenshit and a bore who damages The Church.

I copied my posts on Dalrock’s site just in case…and made a separate article out of it.

Good thing too, because he’s a hypocrite.

I did note one of His posters congratulated another for giving me an imagined “mushroom stamp” after which, both homoerotic posters bravely ran and hid.  No Dalrockian Outrage, there…for Gay Penis references.  On His Holy Site. What a guy.

All of The Good Christian Posters of course piled on – after The Almighty Pre-Announced his banning, to give them ample typing time To Be Right and shake Fists of Outrage at one…

…who is forcefully silenced.  How virtuous.  These hypocrites are the ones who wanted to stone Mary Magdalene.  They, are not the cooing gentlekittykhristians who wiped her tears.

(Remember, this is from a guy who eulogized the snippy Ferdinand Bardamoo as The Greatest Writing Talent of the 21st Centrury!  Amazing, how sucking ferd’s cock for blog hits, blogrolls and links sways a happily married man who likes to play Imaginary Tea Set Princess with online puppets.  I wondered why they wuz palz.)

Christians deem ANY disagreement as trolling because they have no answers.  God, it appears (in His Infinite Wisdom) has given them no answers.  Nor weapons to combat disagreement except The Banhammer.  Great and Mighty God – with all that Power.  What’s He do? Creates The Banhammer.  He who parted seas relies on forum tools.

Thou Shalt Only Agree With Thine Dalrock, Commandment 11

Nothing like having a blog on the internets and inviting “discourse” amongst differing views to…PREACH TO THE CHOIR.

Remember Thy Blog, To Keep It Holy, Commandment 16

Hypocrite, or not?  Being banned at Dalcock is like being kicked out of Sunday School by the cranky teacher for chewing gum – while he has a Hustler in his desk. Dalrock is an ass-kisser. Will BJ for linkage.  NOT getting kicked out of Sunday School for chewing gum means...there’s sumpin’ wrong witchoo, boy!

Whatever the verdict, this display of sanctimonious attitude by him and his participants is the perfect example of Pharisaical Arrogance that shames The Church.  It displays precisely why young people want nothing to do with The Church – why churches sit empty, and are demolished.  Why America has lost its moral honor.  Why Sunday is no longer “church day” but Football Day.  Now, only fat old people who can’t get laid attend church.  Holy Jesus fucking Christ – it’s easy for that type to be Xtian: They have no other choice. 

It’s not like the lace-collar and Bible Set give me any hits or post on Eradica. Because my words have pinpoint accuracy – they hurt those who lie, delude and fabricate traps to ensnare the unwitting and young.  They mistakenly imagine me sitting at my keyboard, fuming, sputtering in rage – veins popping out of my neck – when nothing could be further from the truth.  I respond as I would to a debate in my luxurious family room – in quiet confidence.  There is nothing more stupid than raising one’s blood pressure over an argument – especially online with hypocrites.  Nope, sad to inform you I am usually bemused, not vitriolic.   They think I’m a meanie:  If you want to witness (for comparison) the difference between The Two Firepowers simply arouse my true meanness in a forum that actually has Free Speech.  I will carve you a new asshole from the bejeezus I’ve scourged out of you.  I’ll show your simpering-faggot-ass what Firepower Mean really is.

I wrote a few more posts but he deleted them before I even noticed.  None of them had cursing.   When I finally did notice his deviousness, I told him to go Fuck himself.  So what does he do?  He intentionally posts it as “F***” but with the cutesy asterisks – to deliberately show his bleating followers the “naughty sweary word.”  A pure Cunt Move.  Go see for yourself, but cunts usually take shit like that down when called on it.  Watch movies like The Apostle with Robert Duvall and Elmer Gantry (written by Sinclair Lewis) with Burt Lancaster and you’ll literally, get the picture.

Firepower: I temper my foul temper to engage in an adult discussion. Remind me to NEVER take seriously your self-stated Pharisaical piety in regards to Christian “statements” you make on this blog – or any others. Don’t EVER post on my blog. Beware.

Dalrock says:
June 14, 2012 at 10:10 am
@Firepower
The bulk of your contribution here has been to tangle with other commenters. Why are you here on my blog lecturing my readers not to comment on yours? The solution seems obvious.

That – and a few questions why These Christians follow Paul instead of Jesus – was all she wrote…

Then, I had a Revelation!  All those years wondering “why do ‘non-believers’ hate Christians? Why-0-why-0-why, sweet Jeebus?” I finally had my answer:  Christians are Cunts.  Insular whiners.  The Prototypical Screamer Gang against The Latest Outrage!™ railing against injustice with fervent invective – but using others to do their dirty work and bleed.

  • Save the Africans?  Send us your money.
  • Save The Church?  With your tax-break money.
  • Save the Children? Pray harder that God grants preachers less hard-ons

Dalrock is the Internet Caiaphas. I’d better not see any of your sanctimonious asses on sites I habituate or I’ll publicly repack all your turdcutters.  I loathe hypocrites as much as plagiarists – they are cousins of evil.

 

32 Responses to “Dalrock: Deceptive Hypocrite, Bore & Apostate”

  1. I can’t remember ever going to Dalrock’s, but I’ve heard the name and know that he was in with IMF.

    Religion is a very divisive issue. I have a good friend who is venomently against it. Everyone has a jelly spot. For you it’s plagarism, for me its race.
    [for someone so sanctimonious as to censor me for dissent is a laff when you saw how Dalcock had ferdinand’s cock so far up his ass, he had two adam’s apples. Pure blog whore]

  2. Firepower,

    Are you a white Supremacist?
    [ed note: having been used for over 40 years, that term has as much impact now, as “hutterite” or “Huguenot.” whites are indeed, better; all one need do is compare detroit to salt lake city. america to mexico or africa. the core problem arises when assessing the quality of the present generation of whites. 1940’s whites were ‘supreme’ but today’s? they’ve proven all they do well is bitch, play games, and bitch]

  3. What exactly do you mean concerning the “impact” of the term under discussion? You aren’t saying that white men don’t call themselves “white Supremacists” because it has no impact, are you? And what is the charge of “racism” other than calling one a “white Supremacist?” It’s not exactly true to say white males are the enemy of radical liberalism when it is really “white Supremacy” that is the enemy of radical liberalism. The enemy of ALL the liberationist movements is the “white Supremacist.”
    [ed note: You need to write your question a bit clearer. From what I gather “the enemy of ALL the liberationist movements {may be} the “white Supremacist” as I’ve seen no auccesful counteractions worthy of such a noble, militant title]

  4. You say the label “white Supremacist” has no “impact.” You were vague, but I read this as saying that it was this lack of “impact” that had you not ascribe the “white Supremacist” label to yourself.

    Of course, the label has incredible and near incomparable “impact.” Yet, its “impact” is waning in real terms AMONGST those who could actually wield it, but its “impact” grows substantially in the delusional minds of the ever more radical liberal.

    White Supremacy is the number one enemy of the “white” self-annihilator, the “black” liberationist, the homosexual, the devout dyke, la raza, the jihadist, the atheist, the libertarian, the anarchist, etc. ALL liberationist movements fear, loathe and hate “white Supremacy.” Thus, they target white males for annihilation. Some submit and become liberated “white” self-annihilators and others resist and become what exactly? White Supremacists?

    Even when a Hispanic calls a Japanese a “racist,” he is saying “don’t be like a white Supremacist.”
    [I’ve long-planned on writing on wn – and its similarities as an elder version of mrm. I haven’t seen whites do anything amidst a swarm of enemies on the field of battle – except become Pareenes, obamaites and owsers.]

  5. I dont get it. Why do you insist that people are following Paul and not Jesus? that seems off.
    [it’s all dalrock argues – Pauline Epistle minutiae. Christ said ‘believe in Me, obey the commandments, go and sin nor more.” That’s it; you’re saved. PAUL is the one that feeds dalrocks blogghits, arguing about women’s hair length, should they speak in church, etc]

  6. I was looking at the thread where you said something along the lines of “is Paul the son of God?”. I couldnt find what you wrote before that in the same thread, maybe it was deleted in mod, so i have no context.
    [i wouldn’be surprised if dalrook deleted it]
    from what was there, it seems that what you are doing is that “since Jesus specifically didnt address it, it must not be so”.
    [think about it: who’s Word is greater – Christ’s or Paul’s? Is not Peter’s word greater than Pauls – peter was a disciple, hand chosen by the Son of God IN PERSON. Paul, he was a guy who said he had a vision.]
    I will have to wait on your response to know what context you were saying and I will be glad to “debate” you. Jesus is the fulfillment of the law. Just keep that in mind and that is how i will argue my case, assuming that i have an idea of what you were trying to say the first time (your post before, it there were, are not there-which could have been deleted)

    • O-Tony:

      I will have to wait on your response to know what context you were saying and I will be glad to “debate” you. Jesus is the fulfillment of the law. Just keep that in mind and that is how i will argue my case, assuming that i have an idea of what you were trying to say the first time (your post before, it there were, are not there-which could have been deleted)

      I am glad to see someone finally approached the fearsome challenge.

      Dalrock boasts “We need worthy adversaries!”
      http://dalrock.wordpress.com/2012/06/04/we-need-worthy-adversaries/
      Then bans those adversaries. Would God be pleased at boastful natures that issue a such a challenge, then run?

      Hulk Hogan preening in the ring, then having The Ref cheat him a win. Does God play such games?
      Floyd Mayweather Jr. calling out a challenge to Manny Pacquiáo – then hiding in redtape pettifoggery.

      Dalrock IS Caiaphas, Gesticulating grandiosely in fancy Silk Robes, VERY publicly seeking The Messiah – then when He comes, pffffft.

      Christ said (generally)
      “obey the commandments, accept me as messiah, go and sin no more.”

      That’s it. Whose word is to be followed more assiduously by a christian – christ’s or paul’s?

      • what did Christ say/didnt say that is contradictory to Paul? Paul clearly knew Jesus to be Lord/God.

      • It’s what Paul added to Christ’s words. Jesus didn’t mention hair length or all the gossipy rules that Paul did, in his Epistles.

      • Well…at least ONE dalrockian stood up for his Faith. Still, it’s not much.
        Typical 21st Century “xtian missionary’s disease” – talk a big a game about “how peeple gots to need jeezus” then trot off 4 blocks to church and leave the missionary work to idiots.

      • Yet Jesus ‘didn’t’ have the foresight to invite non-gentiles into the kingdom of heaven. Or perhaps God revealed all ofthis to his SON on the cross. Paul was a great man who in secular terms ‘invented’ a religion. Nothing is as lol worthy as non-Christians trying to point Paul’s ‘flaws’ and his non-understanding of Christs teachings. Didn’t Nietzsche have a crack at this?

        And to the the wn, du du du Paul was jewish types, so was Kissinger and he’s the best fucking foreign secretary you faggots have had!

      • Christ “came down” to free mankind from hundreds of crazy Old Testament Torah rules; no slaying a goat on the Sabbath; don’t eat unleavened shellfish etc.

        Christ was the Son of God and his only message was “believe I’m the Son of God and Messiah and sin no more” and you’ll gain Heaven.

        Paul bops in and re-complicates it all with rules Christ never stated such as asserting “women must have long hair and not speak in Church” etc.

        Paul didn’t even know Christ – he came on the scene decades later, while Christ’s own DISCIPLES like Peter and John are supplanted by Paul. Where are Peter’s writings? The one Christ said was “the rock upon which I’ll build My Church?” Why does The Rock have one book, and Paul many? Why didn’t Christ state His own rules of female hair length. Fishy stuff…

      • Shit, 16 days after my comment (as opposed to the post which is the original body of work morons) is posted, I get a reply.
        [ed note: apologies, chief. after I called him out, the daldorkians gave me much EMAIL distraction, but no public challenge. I wrote a ton of other articles]

        FP, if Paul and his message doesn’t exist or his message isn’t advanced, Catholicism (and thus your lukewarm faggoted protestantism) doesn’t exist. We’re not even having this (elongated) argument.
        [prot v cath has nothing to do with the Proto-Church of Paul’s unfair rise to preeminence in xtianity. NOTHING satisfactorily explains Paul’s volume over Peter’s incredible disappearance]

      • Paul has everything to do with Protestant Cunts chief.

        Just witness the fag and lezzers (and their Communist Masters plus their dipshited followers) and their ‘Paul is irrelevant’ bs. Your sprouting the same shit as them, ‘follow the hippy Jesus man, he was one kool dewd…and didn’t bumb on about morals like that party pooper Paul’.
        [if Jesus be God, why follow Paul, who wasn’t even a disciple, like Pete? Why make Pauline word paramount, instead of The Jesus? If Jesus be not god, why follow him at all?]
        Heard it all before.

        No Paul = no Catholicism*.

        *Which equals no Protestant Yank Cunts (which may be a positive as it save the rest of us a Nuke).

      • All’s you are is another Yank ani-Papist anti-Government/federalist Cunt. I had high hopes for you but your just like the rest of the alt-right……………………………………………………..with a tad more humour 😉
        [I’m hoping you see, (thru a Sea O’ Fostas – or maybe a saucy Shirazz) that you replied to somebody named “0-tony” and not me. That’s why it took “16 Weeks” to reply. btw, is that ozzie time, like “dogyears” or somthing? Yes, I am ant-gov anti-fed. Does that make you pro-gov pro-fed? Is ALL you want a return to Black & White Stuka Days?” That’s so simplistic, it reeks of folly. Present your case.]

  7. Dalrock is a rambling piece of shit. He never DOES a goddamn thing but cry about church shit. He’s like that old churchlady skit you see on vh1 reruns. Talks about the same boring garbage that nobody gives a shit about. He sure did suck ferdinands dick like you say thogh… “oooh, i’m a crhistian!!! look at me!!! godgod, oh and btw, let’s link to IMF and all their exposing of hypocrisy!” Dumbass.
    [ed note: agreed, he is a pompous piece of self-important shit – only brave on his website (or is it ‘His’ blog?)

    say, if Christ decided to get Crucified in the Comfort of Heaven, instead of venturing down here, would it still count? Would it count if Paul said it would?. Stay tuned for These ‘grecycled GEMS on the Next Churcy Chat!]

  8. Matthew 7:21-23 (HCSB) 21 “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord!’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but ⌊only⌋ the one who does the will of My Father in heaven. 22 On that day many will say to Me, ‘Lord, Lord, didn’t we prophesy in Your name, drive out demons in Your name, and do many miracles in Your name?’ 23 Then I will announce to them, ‘I never knew you! Depart from Me, you lawbreakers!’

  9. lzozozlzozzl r u saying dalrock is ascribe and phairirisieieesss?? lzozlzlzozl
    [ed note: I hath seen many a scribe. Their rote nature and bureaucracy of words doth betray them. Verily I say unto thee: dalcrock be both pharisee and scribe. Firepower 3:16]

    But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in. 14Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows’ houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation.

    15Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.

    16Woe unto you, ye blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor! 17Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gold, or the temple that sanctifieth the gold? 18And, Whosoever shall swear by the altar, it is nothing; but whosoever sweareth by the gift that is upon it, he is guilty. 19Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gift, or the altar that sanctifieth the gift? 20Whoso therefore shall swear by the altar, sweareth by it, and by all things thereon. 21And whoso shall swear by the temple, sweareth by it, and by him that dwelleth therein. 22And he that shall swear by heaven, sweareth by the throne of God, and by him that sitteth thereon.

    23Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone. 24Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel.

    25Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess. 26Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also.

    27Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness. 28Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.

    29Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous, 30And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. 31Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets. 32Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. 33Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?

    34Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city: 35That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar. 36Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation.

    37O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! 38Behold, your house is left unto you desolate. 39For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.

  10. lzozlzolzozooz

    23And when he was come into the temple, the chief priests and the elders of the people came unto him as he was teaching, and said, By what authority doest thou these things? and who gave thee this authority? 24And Jesus answered and said unto them, I also will ask you one thing, which if ye tell me, I in like wise will tell you by what authority I do these things. 25The baptism of John, whence was it? from heaven, or of men? And they reasoned with themselves, saying, If we shall say, From heaven; he will say unto us, Why did ye not then believe him? 26But if we shall say, Of men; we fear the people; for all hold John as a prophet. 27And they answered Jesus, and said, We cannot tell. And he said unto them, Neither tell I you by what authority I do these things.
    [Jesus: History’s FIRST Jewish lawyer…]

    28But what think ye? A certain man had two sons; and he came to the first, and said, Son, go work to day in my vineyard. 29He answered and said, I will not: but afterward he repented, and went. 30And he came to the second, and said likewise. And he answered and said, I go, sir: and went not. 31Whether of them twain did the will of his father? They say unto him, The first. Jesus saith unto them, Verily I say unto you, That the publicans and the harlots go into the kingdom of God before you. 32For John came unto you in the way of righteousness, and ye believed him not: but the publicans and the harlots believed him: and ye, when ye had seen it, repented not afterward, that ye might believe him.

    33Hear another parable: There was a certain householder, which planted a vineyard, and hedged it round about, and digged a winepress in it, and built a tower, and let it out to husbandmen, and went into a far country: 34And when the time of the fruit drew near, he sent his servants to the husbandmen, that they might receive the fruits of it. 35And the husbandmen took his servants, and beat one, and killed another, and stoned another. 36Again, he sent other servants more than the first: and they did unto them likewise. 37But last of all he sent unto them his son, saying, They will reverence my son. 38But when the husbandmen saw the son, they said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance. 39And they caught him, and cast him out of the vineyard, and slew him. 40When the lord therefore of the vineyard cometh, what will he do unto those husbandmen? 41They say unto him, He will miserably destroy those wicked men, and will let out his vineyard unto other husbandmen, which shall render him the fruits in their seasons.

    lzozozozozlzozlzo

  11. 28But what think ye Dalrock? A certain man had two sons; and he came to the first, and said, Son, go work to day in my vineyard. 29He answered and said, I will not: but afterward he repented, and went. 30And he came to the second, named Dalrock, and said likewise. And Dalrock answered and said, I go, sir: and went not. 31Whether of them twain did the will of his father? They say unto him, The first. Jesus saith unto them, Verily I say unto you, That the publicans and the harlots go into the kingdom of God before Dalrock. 32For Firepowercame unto you in the way of righteousness, and ye believed him not: but the publicans and the harlots believed him: and ye, when ye had seen it, repented not afterward, that ye might believe him.

    zlozzlzoz

  12. Dalrock is a clueless mangina and copycat, writing about the same Church issues every month. He does The Lord a great disservice with his half-baked, crackpot theories of Christianity.
    [yep, and both HE and his Disciples are Gutless Faggots…ANY place but Their Board. Look at their Daring Replies here: True missionary mentality for 2012. Talk Big on Sunday in the church for the preacha, run and hide (and watch TV) monday moanin’]

  13. It really amazes me how stupid thordaddy is, I thought none could top fp or panzer pat. Fucking AMAZING. thordaddy is like some 70’s nazi. LOTTS OF GOOD that shit did, dipshit.

  14. My husband and i felt joyous Christ managed to complete his investigations by way of the precious recommendations he grabbed in the world. It is now and again perplexing. So we recognize we have got the our blood owner to thank because of that. The most important illustrations you made, the friendships you aid to engender – it’s got mostly remarkable, and it’s really aiding our son and us recognize that that article is heresy!

    [ed note: with folks like you (and DalDork) proselytizing profligately, positive I am that he will pack fresh souls into heaven. which, is why I left your post up for all to foray – forsaking fornication]

  15. Dalcrock is still an APOSTATE and hypocrite.

    Sucking Vox Day’s cock for webhits. He, who (like me) would round up all coloreds and put into camps gets his balls licked by The Holy Man of God – Mr. Daldork.

    Some Xtian: hey, faggot – what does Goddie n’ Jeebuz think of eradicating coloreds?

    Some snap-ay Bible Quote you wanna lay down?
    I thought not. Faggot.

    You’re too busy cooing over “god’s mercy” at saving an Oklahomo Tornado Orphan Puppy… while neglecting how all that rubble got there.
    Hypocrite.
    Liar.

  16. Sir,
    I noticed that you share one of my blog entries in this blog. I am to be quite honest very confused about the topic of your post.Maybe it is because I’m new to the Blogger scene or maybe it’s because it’s hard for me to understand what you are writing, since you use an English that is hard to decipher for a Foreigner like me. I don’t know. All I know is that I’m not the biggest fan of the Language you use.
    If possible, please tell what this post is about and how it relates to my post.

    [ednote: what country are you from?]

    • I will try to simplify: The battle against the apostates of Hypocrisy for the victory of truth is the noblest battle, yet many are still ensnared.

      • I am originally from Germany. As much as I can symphysis with your views I don’t like the language you use, especially use of the word faggot. I therefore withdraw my approval that you can share my link.

      • Informing me you don’t approve and
        That you are removing my link –
        Is pure faggotry

        You should be sucking my Jesustaff in gratitude for the Linkage Teh Great Firepowerz Gaveth You – and Goddie

        Du bist ein laus!

  17. Sir,
    I noticed that you shared my link on this post. Since I had great difficulties- due to the Language you used- to understand your post, I ask you kindly to explain to me what it’s all about. Is my blog entry linked in a positive way or in a negative one?
    An explanation would really help me

Trackbacks

Leave Comment: Comments do not require an email -- or even logging in

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: