Firepower’s Hierarchy of Blogging

by Firepower

Everything in the alt-right blogosphere (how I hate those silly-ass words) is blog recycled (‘grecycled) from a few great minds.  Even Rushie gets his ideas from The Great Minds.  But, rushie has a purpose: He’s deliberately facile so you can listen to him on the radio.  Plus, he’s witty.

Read books from the writers starting at the top of the list, then decrease the amount you need/read as you approach the bottom.  Unless, your education level requires you need to get your info solely from bloggers.

Google them for yourself.  Buy their books on amazon.  Enlarge your brain.  Put down your light summer reading of 50 Shades of Sasha Gray. Put down the YouPorn andremote control.  End DWTS’ Dominance of Dance.  Pull your head out of your cunt.

Beware any blogger who ‘grecycles “ideas” from the top down of this list as if their own.  If you need someone to tell you what The Great Man Meant, you, my simple friend – are fucking hopeless.  You need ideas from the original sources in order to find your own way.  It’s called synthesis. Synthesis works because it forms actual new connections in your brain, that you in turn, can utilize to …..…..absorb the next big idea coming down the pike.  All by your little old self!

Those Who’ve Done It Before – Better:

  1. Charles Murray; William Bennett; Robert Bork; Victor Davis Hanson – These chaps awe and inspire…
  2. Thomas Sowell,  Chas. Krauthammer, who in turn make big bucks for
  3. Pat Buchanan – whose bulldog wrinkled puss inspires TV fashion-talkshow pussy
  4. Ann Coulter & Michelle Malkin – who give quippy-quip conversational bits to talkers
  5. Rush Limbaugh/Sean Hannity and then,
  6. Brent Bozell & R.I.P Andrew Breitbart (chiefly by critiquing) give them coaching & acting tips.

Or, to be brought up to speed in mere seconds, simply read Mallard Fillmore.

In my next article, I’ll delineate and describe the the 7th Place T-Ball Winners (and under) who tell you what somebody told them the guys on the list, meant.

 

 

31 Responses to “Firepower’s Hierarchy of Blogging”

  1. Argh. Where is the William Pierce, the George Lincoln Rockwell, Tom Metzger? I don’t know half of those alt right jags. I think that’s the list of kosher conservative pseudo racial realists.
    [You must accept the reality, that even piggy had more readers this week than all those on your list combined. A new way is needed. The past is a failure. When liberals failed with Ted Kennedy style of big government, they re-invented themselves into Obamaites – and got their big gov.]

    • Asking a White Nationalist to accept reality? lol, you’re a classic.

    • “even piggy had more readers this week than all those on your list combined”

      That’s not terribly surprising. Successful alt right bloggers don’t allow Jew-bashing stupidity to be posted.
      [ed note: if the opposite of WN are Obama-ites and the ilk, they have done quite the smashing job on America the last 35 years]

  2. Look on the bright side. Bardamu claims to be taking down his blog because of a secret overseas mission, or some such shit. I’ll bet the losers who allegedley donated $1,000 to his site are real happy about that.

    In other news, Half Sigma again reveals that he is nothing but an elitist wannabe. Unlike IMF, however, his site is actually worth reading. It proves that elitists despise NAM’s just as much as the rest of us do. Unfortunately, they despise us just as much.

    • “…secret overseas mission, or some such shit.”

      lol!!! I guess “i’ve met a girl and got a pay raise” wouldn’t have been heroic enough?

      Ferd was at his best when he was a seething nihilist but that flame seems to have gone out. Probably for the best from a IRL perspective.

      [ed note: i’m withholding comment on this issue at present]

      On the Yids, they deserve to have their feet held to the flame. The problem is this often degenerates into holocaust denial and tools who use the acronym ‘ZOG’ sprouting their bullshit.

      • Objectively you didn’t like any of Ferds work? I thought his Gen Zero stuff was very good. On a personal level I didn’t agree with him banning you but otherwise he seems like a good bloke.
        [never read him again afterwards. anyone banning brilliant contributors hasn’t the brains worth reading. he was jealous. the sockpuppet kidstuff proved him a phony without courage. that is odious to me]

      • CORRECTION: “…he seems like a good bloke, unlike Pat Hannagan”.

        That’s better.

      • You didn’t miss much, he turned into a bloody socialist.

  3. So whats wrong with RACIAL SOCIALISTS? Your choice of capitalist wannabe neocons are all false flags.Even if they dont realize it.Tom metzger

    • You must realize the “top” tiers are not Adolf Hitler & Co. because that’s not the way it works in Murka no matter how many Lil’ Stormfronters stomp their hobnailed feetsies to wish it so.

      I like racial socialists. Most everyone else must be eradicated.

      Argue politics all you want.
      It’s what Murkans have done best for a century while watching the turd circle the toilet bowl.

      You know what you need to do.

      • FP

        So “Tom Metzger” as “racial socialist” DOES NOT EQUAL “white” anti-Capitalist? I bet otherwise. But it is interesting to note that while most outsiders who come to Eradica probably perceive “white supremacy,” it is in reality a place of socialists and communists of Caucasian persuasion. The problem is that being a socialist has real world consequences that its adherents are loathe to acknowledge. The first such consequence understood to be a “principled” stand against Capitalism. But what is the actual socialist/communist “principle” at play as it regards its abhorrence for Capitalism? And what is the purpose in racializing one’s socialist outlook?

        We live in the land of radical autonomy. Capitalist socialist makes perfect sense.

      • Eradican…

        What you don’t seem to be aware of is that China is still an example of communist machinations operating inside a Capitalistic paradigm AND NOT crypto-capitalists operating inside a communist paradigm.

        If you voluntarily LIMIT youR understanding of “capital” in order to achieve an intellectual coherence with your metaphysics then YOU ARE STILL STUNTED in your understanding of Capitalism. To you, “Capitalism” is just tangible things and the mechanisms to move these things and socialists can play with “Capitalism” at will. In reality, Capitalism is essentially the hierarchy of man and his battle for greater credibility. In this scheme, “socialists,” “racial socialists,” “communists,” etc. are just another variant of global player in the Capitalist paradigm. Their shtick, of course, is to POSE as anti-Capitalists. To PRETEND as though there were no hierarchy or man and a battle for greater credibility. Obviously, such a zealous ideology is preferred by those with a softer psychology.

    • What’s wrong with a racial socialist?

      He is WORSE than just a particular socialist BECAUSE he thinks his race absolves him of a critique of his degenerate thinking.

      Since…

      Racial socialist = “white” anti-Capitalist

      Then…

      A “racial socialist” is a code phrase for “white” anti-Capitalist and thus = a “white” person who believes capital should flow to the least worthy of “white men” and their mal-“investments.”

      How one can lament the death of America while cheerleading in a future NS regime (literally, a nation of “white” socialists and utterly antithetical to America and real Americans) is just more evidence of a fundamental detachment and an incoherency found amongst many WNs.

      • Everyone with a healthy sense of self-worth thinks their inherent characteristics absolve them.

        Capitalism is needed to fund The Eradication Machine, and valued for the busywork it gives trailerpark whites.

        Keep in mind, capital is not mere money, but the ways and means of producing goods & services.

        You describe a WN Welfare State. No one may sit idle. Those that stubbornly do so must be interred in re-education camps.

      • FP…

        What I did was answer the question. I don’t read an actual rebuttal to my more exacting clarification.

        Racial socialist = “white” anti-Capitalist

        “white” anti-Capitalist = anti-white Supremacist

        anti-white Supremacist = radical liberationist

        radical liberationist = racial socialist

        A nation of socialists is literally the individual citizen socialist proliferated like a cancer. It is destructive to have even one “white man” believe that capital should and can flow to the least worthy of “white” men. To have a nation of such thinkers obviously evidences a desire for self-annihilation.

        Capital is more than money and the means to distribute products and services. Capital is literally the credibility of men themselves.

        The proper economic order is this:

        The man with the most credibility = the man with the most Capital and the man with the most Capital is the man with the most credibility.

        The “racial socialist” wants to crush this order under the pretense of being to white man’s benefit. Dastardly sell.

      • Untrue.
        Often, your arguments invalidate themselves by their own over complication.
        Non Sequitur logical fallacies are impressive, but no less truthful than Argument ad Ignorantium.

        Your first point assumes the white racial socialist must be anti-capitalist and this is wrong.

        The Third Reich’s capitalists (like IG Farben, etc) flourished. The regime blessed them with the spoils of conquered enemies’ capital: Factories, workers and slaves etc.

        Such a white racial socialist ideology proves possible it may do well when it likes its own capitalism so much it harms the enemy’s.

      • The radical liberationists pretend to be beyond the basics, but they are desirous of a primitive state. In the world of hard metrics, if you ask, “Who is the man with the most capital?” You HAVE TO SAY, “Carlos Slim or Bill Gates (depending on the timeframe). Lamely limited to benefit radical liberationists. If you GO BEYOND hard metrics — where wealth is a plethora of memes uttered and obeyed 2000 years later — then the man with the most Capital CANNOT change. The standard was set BECAUSE the credibility is impeccable. The feats are not up for replication.

        So in all this intellectual debate between Capitalism versus anti-Capitalism (socialism in liberal-speak), no one ever asks who is the man with the most Capital and why it only matters if one is not CONFINED to hard metrics. In which case, the question is rather pointless. It could change anytime.

      • Just to clarify…

        If one is confined to just hard metrics in answering this most fundamental question concerning the legitimacy of Capitalism then the question BECOMES pointless. Thus, there is a desire to restrict the conception of Capitalism to hard metrics when the real proof of Capitalism will always be found in truly credible (white) men. Making the question pointless by reducing it to hard metrics detaches Capitalism from man and the natural demand to raise the standard either individually or collectively. This is the exact aim of the socialist. The racial socialist HIDES behind white nationalism and seeks the same goal.

      • The supreme authority above all others is force. In the final analysis wherever the communists seized power they improved their countries. Red China is on the verge of being an economic superpower but thordaddy is spouting bizarre propaganda BS. Reactionaries past and present are still desperately trying to discredit revolutionary action.

      • The modern malinvestment found in China is so unprecedented as to practically beg for colonization. China may call itself communist, but rest assured that genuine Capitalism runs rampant at the top. It must. The battle for credibility and thus capital amongst men is eternal. China’s rise (in standard of living across broad section of demographics) is in direct proportion to the debt taken on by millions of middle and lower class Americans who buy Chinese “goods.”

      • Empty shopping malls, foreclosed properties, accounting fraud, and ghost towns exist here too so the idea they’re unique to China is a myth. The malinvestment in Murka is 100x worse than anything in China. They have uninhabited cities while we have uninhabitable cities. Centuries ago Chinese paid tribute to barbarian hordes but not anymore yet today Murkans pay tribute to the colored hordes. Who has it worse them or “the land of the free” hmmm?

        Simple production and export of consumer junk is over. Red China is competing at the regional level in high end industries like banking/finance, telecommunications, energy, biotechnology, aerospace, luxury retail, armaments, etc. Their biggest trade partner is now Europe and they’re creating domestic demand as well. Another sign they’ve moved beyond simple manufacturing is their corporate, industrial, and military espionage. The hysteria over “Chinese hacking” is an example of how far they’ve come.

      • (Note: this retort should have posted here)

        FP
        So “Tom Metzger” as “racial socialist” DOES NOT EQUAL “white” anti-Capitalist? I bet otherwise. But it is interesting to note that while most outsiders who come to Eradica probably perceive “white supremacy,” it is in reality a place of socialists and communists of Caucasian persuasion. The problem is that being a socialist has real world consequences that its adherents are loathe to acknowledge. The first such consequence understood to be a “principled” stand against Capitalism. But what is the actual socialist/communist “principle” at play as it regards its abhorrence for Capitalism? And what is the purpose in racializing one’s socialist outlook?

        We live in the land of radical autonomy. Capitalist socialist makes perfect sense.

      • I have only a vague notion/recollection of a “tom metzger” from ryu’s question and cannot recall tm; I do not read anybody else but ryu, eradican and LOTB – in that order.

        If I Ruled The Nation, my program would simultaneously encourage massive capitalism to pay for eradicating every MINO in the land.

        If I can envision such a government, so would many prudent WNS.

        Reality is, there are plenty of trailerpark whites who are only fit to be coal miners, shit shovelers and lawn mowers. Not every white can be installed in a mansion.

      • Tom Metzger was a well known racist in the 80s and 90s. He was the first to say that the USSR was not the white man’s enemy. It would be an honor if he actually showed up here.

      • So Tom Metzger = first American “racist” to claim white Americans can be friends with “white” communists BECAUSE… We are white and “white” and American and Communist have no intrinsic meaning, apparently.

    • Even if we accept what you are saying, how does communism actually tell the tale? How does a collectivist ideology explain success where no real collectivist ethos actually exists?

      • They do exist your perception of communism is just tainted by a lifetime of misinformation. There is nothing wrong with trade, enterprise, profit, and commerce. All countries regardless of ideology must have an economy and preferably a strong one. However in a Marxist-Leninist state the “commanding heights” of the economy are state controlled. Key industries are managed like utilities and surplus profits are used for public purposes instead of private gain. This also minimizes individuals/factions from amassing enormous wealth and by extension political power. A major problem today are the elites using ownership over production and by extension state power to push agendas directly harmful to the masses.

  4. They have uninhabited cities while we have uninhabitable cities. Centuries ago Chinese paid tribute to barbarian hordes but not anymore yet today Murkans pay tribute to the colored hordes. Who has it worse them or “the land of the free” hmmm?

    Great comments from Eradican!

    It’s a joke that ghetto NAMs are now more threatening than the Huns or Mongols of the past. Atilla and Genghis must be turning in their graves.

Trackbacks

Leave Comment: Comments do not require an email -- or even logging in

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: